Raphael Coeffic wrote: > Gentlemen, > > i guess you all are getting pretty impatient about the long awaited 1.0 > release. So now i'd like to ask you all: do we still have any > show-stopper for, say, at least release candidate #1? Please speak now > or never! ;-)
I have ZRTP patch (all compile time optional) lying here I would like to see in 1.0, and an application to record greeting message (its actually silly to not have one, given how simple that is). I'll do that today so lets do the branch tomorrow if that is ok with everyone. I have prepared complete prompt set with TTS from spokentext.net to replace my self recorded (incomplete) ones. I've asked them whether its ok to publish with SEMS but haven't got a response yet. nothing on their site terms seems to be against using them so we might as well simply use them. the webconference room timeout bug should be fixed I think. I also see this log message appearing sometimes: Error: (trans_layer.cpp)(send_request)(522): Message was: <BYE sip:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.1.102:5070 SIP/2.0^M which looks like something is messing up the contact parser. > > From then, we will branch the HEAD into 1.0 branch. After that, only > bug-fixes will be commited to that branch. head? thats trunk is it? Stefan > > Cheers, > Raphael. > _______________________________________________ > Sems mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iptego.com iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
