Stefan Sayer wrote: > > Raphael Coeffic wrote: >> Gentlemen, >> >> i guess you all are getting pretty impatient about the long awaited >> 1.0 release. So now i'd like to ask you all: do we still have any >> show-stopper for, say, at least release candidate #1? Please speak >> now or never! ;-) > > I have ZRTP patch (all compile time optional) lying here I would like > to see in 1.0, and an application to record greeting message (its > actually silly to not have one, given how simple that is). I'll do > that today so lets do the branch tomorrow if that is ok with everyone. > ok.
> I have prepared complete prompt set with TTS from spokentext.net to > replace my self recorded (incomplete) ones. I've asked them whether > its ok to publish with SEMS but haven't got a response yet. nothing on > their site terms seems to be against using them so we might as well > simply use them. > ok. > the webconference room timeout bug should be fixed I think. > i guess this is yours. > I also see this log message appearing sometimes: > Error: (trans_layer.cpp)(send_request)(522): Message was: <BYE > sip:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.1.102:5070 SIP/2.0^M > which looks like something is messing up the contact parser. > Bugs will still be fixed in the branch. I just need the corresponding INVITE message, or better: the complete dialog dump. (maybe you can do that with iptego's great tool??). >> >> From then, we will branch the HEAD into 1.0 branch. After that, only >> bug-fixes will be commited to that branch. > head? thats trunk is it? > Yes, sure. -Raphael. _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
