Stefan Sayer writes: > there was SUB/NOT and MWI support in SEMS 0.9 versions, and with some > more recent modifications in the core it should be fairly simple to > pull that over. having said that, I'm not sure the structure of this > is suited to larger user base: in fact some kind of more advanced > (message storage) DB should be used instead of keeping all the > subscriptions and message states in memory. So I think that this would > need to be reworked architecturally.
when state of user's mailbox changes, it is easy to use xmlrpc to send publish request to presence server. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
