Am 19.06.2012 um 21:40 schrieb Jon Bonilla (Manwe) <[email protected]>:
> El Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:20:30 +0200 > Raphael Coeffic <[email protected]> escribió: > >> Hi! >> >> I think Rtcp is only one of the options to solve this problem. Normally, >> session timers should be used for this purpose. However, I haven't checked >> whether or not using session timers would disable the dead RTP timer... >> >> Jon, would that be an option for you? >> > > It's not really an issue for me at the moment. As you said I have session > timer > support and I can detect rtptimeouts in mediaproxy anyways. I just wanted > to show what IMHO is a bug or something to improve in sems. Right, that's definitely a place that needs improvement. Thanks for reporting your experience. RTCP would be a good thing for other uses as well (buffering techniques, codec rate changes, etc...). -Raphael. > Didn't know about > rtcp support status in sems. _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
