o Raphael Coeffic on 06/22/2011 03:20 PM:
On 22.06.11 15:15, Stefan Sayer wrote:
Module: sems
Branch: master
Commit: 38a3109950d94bcec96110a70aa8dce820a01c31
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sems/?a=commit;h=38a3109950d94bcec96110a70aa8dce820a01c31
Author: Stefan Sayer<[email protected]>
Committer: Stefan Sayer<[email protected]>
Date: Wed Jun 22 15:13:25 2011 +0200
b/f: don't change OA state to completed in early dialog
if OA state is changed to completed already when early media SDP
received, final SDP received will be seen as another offer
Der punkt ist: der zweite offer (in 200) ist:
s/offer/answer i guess.
- unnötig.
but still it must be there - even in the same branch - right?
- sollte deckungsgleich mit dem in dem 183 sein.
IMO we should (at least optionally) support changing SDP from early
dialog to real dialog, even if its non-standard; in fact I don't know
why the standdard mandates that it must not change.
Ergo, der korrekt fix sollte den SDP im 200 ignorieren. Wenn du nicht
does that work with SDP in early session from a different branch, too?
in that case we would have to go back to offersent, right?
zu OA_completed wechselst, ist es eher falsch, da offer/answer schon
augetauscht wurde. Es wird z.B. nicht funktionnieren, wenn nach dem
INV/183, einen UPDATE mit einem neuen offer kommt. Dieses scenario ist
normal bei 3GPP.
ok, understood.
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
