4 dec 2012 kl. 02:01 skrev Juha Heinanen <[email protected]>: > Raphael Coeffic writes: > >> Should be committed in the next days (up to 2 weeks), as I am >> currently integrating lots of code we have here into master right >> now. > > ok, good to hear. > >> This done in the SBC profiles. It is a simple parameter. You can >> specify it for either (or both) side. > > it means that sbc needs to get involved even when call terminates to > announcement, voicemail, etc. application in sems. > >>> by the way, cisco ios gateways implement ANAT (rfc 4091), which allows >>> sdp stream contains both ipv4 and ipv6 media address. that would be >>> useful in sems outbound calls too. >>> >> Yes, indeed. In the RFC it says: "obsoleted by RFC5245 (ICE)". Do you >> think I could still consider it as relevant, or just as legacy? > > there are lots of legacy sip clients that don't support ice (which is > very complex to implement). if sems would use anat to include both > addresses in sdp, then the sip proxy that forwards the call and knows ip > version of callee, could easily strip the other address away and callee > would receive a normal non-anat sdp.
There is a discussion on the SIP forum IPv6 list (which you should subscribe to :-) ) about re-instating ANAT. It's a simple fix compared with implementing ICE. /O _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
