o Juha Heinanen on 10/01/2013 03:44 PM: > Stefan Sayer writes: > >>> when sems sends update, it is recommended that also there sems writes >>> ;refresher=uas. >> if you are the refresher, and you are doing the refresh (as uac) a you >> can't require the other side to be the refresher (put refresher=uas), >> therefore sems doesn't put refresher, and hopes the other side takes >> over the refresher role. > > stefan, > > perhaps i was not clear enough. if sems sbc has been the refresher and > sends a new refresh request, rfc recommends that the roles remain the same > as before and therefore sems should put refresher=uac in the new > refresh. the RFC is not written with a B2BUA in mind. For a B2BUA, it makes sense to try to get out of the refresher role. Therefore sems doesn't put 'refresher' parameter there. What you mustn't do is to put refresher=uas there if you are uac and have the refresher role (afair).
Stefan _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
