o Juha Heinanen on 10/01/2013 03:58 PM: > Stefan Sayer writes: > >> the RFC is not written with a B2BUA in mind. For a B2BUA, it makes >> sense to try to get out of the refresher role. Therefore sems doesn't >> put 'refresher' parameter there. What you mustn't do is to put >> refresher=uas there if you are uac and have the refresher role (afair). > > ok, so you want sems to try to get out from the refresher role it got > into when dialog was established. > > why do you think that the result of this new negotiation would be > different from the initial one that made sems the refresher? because mostly everyone including SEMS follows the SHOULD in the rfc when handling SST as UAS.
Stefan _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
