https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blogs/srdja-trifkovic/ukraine-is-a-long-term-affair-
 


Ukraine is a Long-Term Affair


View all posts from this blog 
<https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blogs/srdja-trifkovic/> 

 

By:Srdja Trifkovic | December 19, 2014

 

In the latest issue of the Russian magazine Russkiy Mir (“Russian World,” 
December 10) our foreign affairs editor considers the implications 
<http://russkiymir.ru/publications/158556>  of the crisis in Ukraine for 
Russia’s geostratigic position in the years to come. (Translated from Russian 
by the author)

 

In Ukraine the United States presented Russia with its most serious challenge 
in the last quarter-century. Russia has not responded to that challenge in a 
timely manner. She proved unable to anticipate and then counter the Maidan 
scenario last winter, even though the grand rehearsal was presented with the 
“Orange Revolution” ten years ago. Now Russia’s relations with her 
strategically essential neighbor – Ukraine – are on the brink of rupture, or a 
painful restructuring for decades to come.

 

Normal US-Russian relations would require the recognition that Russia has 
legitimate interests in her near abroad. To understand the Washingtonian 
mindset, however, we need to recall a quote from President Obama’s graduation 
address at West Point in May 2014: “The values of our founding inspire leaders 
in parliaments and new movements in public squares around the globe.” Evidently 
he was alluding to the Maidan.

 

The Founding Fathers would turn in their graves to learn that, according to the 
president of the United States, their values have inspired Messrs. Tyahnibok, 
Yarosh, and other blood-soaked heirs of Stepan Bandera who now sit in the 
Parliament of Ukraine. The mindset is hardly new. In 1999 Senator Joseph 
Lieberman declared, “The United States of America and the Kosovo Liberation 
Army stand for the same values and principles. Fighting for the KLA is fighting 
for human rights and American values.”

 

“The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation,” Obama says. 
“That has been true for the century past, and it will be true for the century 
to come.” In reality it has never been true, it is not true now, and it never 
will be true. Madeleine Albright’s famous claim along those lines back in the 
1990’s was a sign of her mental instability. It was reiterated in Bill 
Clinton’s 1996 speech on Bosnia. That Obama has chosen to recycle such 
inanities is a sign of intellectual and moral bankruptcy, not only his own but 
also that of a sizeable segment of the American foreign policy establishment. 
But the march goes on. If some country dares resist the will of the 
“indispensable nation,” then it is necessarily evil. Susan Rice thus condemned 
China and Russia at the UN for vetoing the U.S.-supported UN Security Council 
resolution to bomb Syria as “disgusting,” “shameful” and “unforgivable.” It’s 
psychotic.

 

A state’s political, military, economic, and moral resources are conventionally 
used in a balanced way to protect or enhance its security. The U.S. is 
practicing a different brand of diplomacy, which is in ample evidence in 
Ukraine. And Russia, in responding to the initial Maidan crisis, has made a 
severe miscalculation.

 

This error now needs to be corrected as part of Russia’s long-term strategy 
aimed at regime change in Kiev. Let us be clear: Moscow will never obtain 
Western recognition of its legitimate interests in the near abroad. Moscow 
should therefore defend its national interests as it deems fit. It should be 
understood that the sanctions and demonization of Russia’s and Putin 
personally, of diplomatic abuse and military pressure, will continue regardless 
of what Russia does. If Russia does not act to prevent the transformation of 
Ukraine into a Russophobic "Banderistan", then the return of the Crimea will 
prove to be scant compensation for the overall weakening of Russia’s 
geopolitical position. To avoid this, Russia needs to do several things.

 

First of all, it should fight the regime in Kiev on all fronts – openly and 
secretly, diplomatically and undiplomatically. No handshakes with Poroshenko. 
Join the already raging information war. Moscow should constantly remind the 
world of the false-flag stunt with the Malaysian Boeing in the sky above 
Ukraine, and insist on a full disclosure of all facts which are still 
concealed. It should demand an investigation of the massacres in Odessa on May 
2 and on May 9 in Mariupol, and an internationally supervised trial. Finally it 
should tell the world about the ongoing mass murder of ordinary people in 
southeastern Ukraine, where a ceasefire is supposed to be in operation.

 

It is necessary to take TV documentaries and feature films revealing these and 
other Western myths. It is necessary to politically support the Novorussian de 
facto independence. The Kiev regime has already lost the right to Novorossia, 
so now it is necessary to support the irreversible changes to ensure its 
viability. Using the U.S. terminology, Russia has the “Responsibility to 
Protect.” In my opinion, Kiev should be forced to abandon all hope for the 
resumption of military operations.

Third, you need to provide political and financial support to the opposition in 
Ukraine, to the non-Banderist civic groups. These groups are small, but given 
the fact that Ukraine is facing inevitable economic collapse, there exists a 
favorable and growing environment for Russia’s use of “soft power.” It is 
necessary to tighten the screws in economic relations with Ukraine, based on an 
understanding that there will be no security, no stability, for as long as Kiev 
is controlled by the current regime. It needs to be discredited, starting with 
the coup February 21, 2014.

 

Regime change in Kiev and Ukraine’s de-nazification are a matter of life and 
death for Russia. Ukraine’s partition is a poor alternative. Even if 
Novorossiya were to include Kharkov and Mariupol, the Banderist remnant will 
become even more Russophobic – and it will still include most of Ukraine, on 
both sides of the Dnieper. That would poison Russian-Ukrainian relations for a 
very long time. It makes more sense to preserve the unity of Ukraine, but to 
create conditions for its denazification.

 

Don’t expect any readiness for compromise from the U.S. They will continue to 
bait their protégés in Kiev to continue military operations in the east. Not 
right now, of course, but in the spring of 2015, when NATO rearms Ukraine’s 
military forces. The chaos in Ukraine is a long-term condition, and this is 
only one part of the global strategy of the United States based on the notions 
of global dominance and exceptionality. Instead of calming the situation in the 
South China Sea, Washington will continue to encourage its Asian satellites 
Japan, South Korea to be tough with China. But as Obama said two years ago, the 
national security strategy is to retain full-spectrum dominance, to maintain 
the ability to counter threats worldwide, and to “confront and defeat 
aggression anywhere in the world.”

 

Meanwhile, the Hudson Institute claims that the situation in Kyrgyzstan is 
critical to U.S. national security, and Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana, 
ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, says that the 
U.S. commitment to Moldova’s territorial integrity is essential if America is 
not to surrender its position in a key region to U.S. foreign policy.

 

So there. Ukraine, Syria, gays, lesbians, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova – all of them are 
among the vital interests of the one indispensable nation. Not one, not even 
the smallest such “interest” can ever be dropped, for – as Obama said at West 
Point – “that’s not leadership; that’s retreat.  That’s not strength; that’s 
weakness.”

 

[Click here 
<https://ru-ru.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=933458686683934&id=164050503624760>
  to go to Russkiy Mir Facebook posting of Srdja Trifkovic's article]

 

 

-- 
Ову поруку сте добили зато што сте пријављени на Google групу „SERBIAN NEWS 
NETWORK“.
Да бисте отказали пријаву у ову групу и престали да примате имејлове од ње, 
пошаљите имејл на [email protected].
Да бисте постављали у овој групи, пошаљите е-поруку на [email protected].
Посетите ову групу на http://groups.google.com/group/senet.
За више опција посетите https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to