spectator.org 
<https://spectator.org/united-states-policy-in-the-balkans-needs-to-change/>  


United States Policy in the Balkans Needs to Change


Nikola Kedhi

9–12 minutes

  _____  

In August 2018, a surprising proposal was sprung on an unassuming public in the 
Republic of Kosovo and in Albania — a territorial swap between Kosovo and 
Serbia, to solve once and for all the issues between the two countries. The 
Presidents of Kosovo and Serbia, Hashim Thaci and Aleksandar Vučić, and the 
Prime Minister of Albania, Edi Rama, were all on the same page on the proposal. 

The rumor that the Trump administration was behind this spread immediately, 
mostly by his critics in the region. It did not help that the National Security 
Advisor to President Donald Trump, John Bolton, showed his support. 
Nevertheless, various members of the Trump administration denied the claims 
that the proposal had come from them, and even Bolton, years later, said that 
it had been the local leaders who had presented the plan to the U.S. 
government. Local media pointed to the Open Society Foundation as the brains 
behind this idea. (READ MORE from Nikola Kedhi: Conservatives Should Restore 
and Improve Reagan’s Fusionism 
<https://spectator.org/conservatives-should-restore-and-improve-reagans-fusionism/>
 )

If implemented, it would have proven a Pandora’s box in a delicate region with 
a fragile status quo, creating a precedent for Bosnia, other parts of the 
Balkans, and even in Europe, bringing back sensitive topics put to rest long 
ago. The potential for ethnic conflict was there, and by undertaking this 
dangerous experiment, the chain reaction that would have started would have 
been consequential for the whole continent.

Strong political leadership is needed … to prevent the unaccountable 
bureaucratic hand from setting policy and enforcing their will.

There was only one leader that stood up against this prospect, alone. Former 
Prime Minister of Albania, and current opposition leader, Sali Berisha, a 
conservative statesman with experience in politics going back many years and an 
unparalleled knowledge in geopolitics, spoke up loudly and harshly against the 
border corrections in the region, and specifically between the Republic of 
Kosovo and the Republic of Serbia. 

As soon as the idea started to circulate, Berisha, in line with the positions 
that later Germany and France would take, became the first to emphasize that 
the “exchange of the territories, was a Serb idea which they had always sought 
with pathological insistence, even before the declaration of independence of 
the Republic of Kosovo. The truth is that in this case Serbia wants to trade, 
to use the Albanian territories as a market product, as it is concerned by the 
ever-greater awakening of national consciousness among the Albanians. Any 
agreement and any solution should be an agreement between two independent 
countries that recognize each other’s territorial integrity.”

A few months later, the U.S. ambassador in Kosovo, Philip Kosnett, stated that 
Washington had never encouraged any idea of changing borders. “If you want a 
peace agreement, you have to sit down and talk with your opponent,” the 
American ambassador added at the time.

Thanks to strong opposition by leaders such as Berisha in Albania, various 
political actors in Kosovo, Germany, and subsequently a vocal rejection by the 
United States, the idea of the territorial swap was abandoned. 

After this episode the idea of the “Minishengen,” or Open Balkans, was 
presented as an alternative to the Berlin Process, an intergovernmental 
cooperation initiative linked to the future enlargement of the European Union. 
While the latter had the oversight and necessary guarantees provided by Germany 
and other European countries, the first included solely Albania, Serbia, and 
Macedonia, with the reluctant on and off participation of Montenegro, and would 
have surely led to Serbian dominance in the region. The United States — or at 
the very least the Department of State — appeared once again to back this new 
idea, with many mixed signals coming from beyond the Atlantic. Pressure 
increased on Kosovo to join, even though Serbia refused to recognize its 
independence and tried to impose its will on the region. 

Nonetheless, out of nowhere, in August 2023, as the war in Ukraine was well 
into its second year, the Open Balkan initiative was declared dead by the 
Albanian prime minister and other factors in the region, returning once again 
to the German-led Berlin Process. Analysts and local political actors, when 
explaining the incoherence in American foreign policy raise the issue of the 
many currents within the American government, often at odds with one another, 
with different aims and methods. These are only two examples where lack of 
American leadership, and careless experimentation of certain segments of the 
American bureaucracy, could have set back hard-earned progress in the region. 

Once again, Sali Berisha, representing the Albanian right, was the leading 
voice in the Balkans urging against a process, which had the blessing of Russia 
and that would have destabilized the Balkans, increasing Russian influence. It 
was the latest in a series of statesmen-like positions that Berisha had held 
during his long career, including his tireless work of getting Albania in NATO 
and starting the process for EU accession. It also includes his consistant 
pro-American and pro-Western policies, his foresight on decreasing energy 
reliance on Russia by lobbying for and building the TAP and many other 
initiatives, for which he does not get the appropriate credit. 

Berisha, conservative voices from his party, and the Kosovo government were 
left alone for many years in opposition to a dangerous plan that would have 
seen Russia slowly usurp the leadership role of the United States in the 
Balkans. Ultimately, they were proven right. The pro-Western Albanian right has 
a legacy of being on the right side of history throughout the past decades. 
Even in the face of inexplicable abandonment from its allies, it has always 
persevered with dignity and held its head high. It has done so even when after 
decades of persecuting the right, communists found refuge in the West, after 
the fall of the Berlin wall. 

The region lacks leaders of the stature of Berisha, who can bring long-term 
stability and who have the capacity to take a stand in delicate moments. “Lab” 
created leaders can never replace the real ones, whose importance, experience, 
and decision-making skills become paramount, especially in fragile regions. One 
of the mistakes the West makes frequently is backing the wrong individuals or 
groups, and that has consequences that all stakeholders subsequently come to 
regret. Helping and supporting communists in Albania during and after 
communism, instead of those persecuted by the bloody regime and who hoped in 
American salvation, has been one such mistake.

The West, especially during the Obama years, supported the so-called 
stabilocracy — meaning the creation of semi-authoritarian regimes in the 
Western Balkans that would keep the status quo and prevent these countries from 
escalating conflicts with each other, at the expense of democracy. On the other 
side, Russian influence in countries such as Serbia is significant, and Albania 
and Kosovo have pinned their hopes to the United States being a fair and honest 
mediator and influence in the region.

However, the West has to know that sacrificing democracy for stability will 
ultimately lead to instability and conflict. History shows no other 
alternative. Many people in the region feel that Western bureaucracy interferes 
in domestic issues, imposing solutions that they believe are the right ones, 
alienating in the process the local people — especially the most pro-European 
and pro-American ones. Attacking democratically elected leaders, particularly 
the ones that have proven themselves to be great allies, and asking for their 
removal through undemocratic processes, can backfire. Trust in American 
leadership is decreasing even among the most pro-American people, and that is 
something only the United States can fix.

The Europeans, meanwhile, for all their talk of democracy and rule of law, are 
happy to stay on the sideline and see a whole region fall into 
authoritarianism. Fortunately, Albanian center-right conservatives can rise to 
the challenges of our time and prove to be a positive force in the region, if 
given the chance, building on the legacy of previous generations of the right 
and drawing from the experience of leaders such as Berisha. 

The region would be worse off under Russian and Chinese influences — there can 
be no doubt about that. However, it is also clear that American actions are the 
ones that are leading to a waning of American influence. It seems nonsensical, 
but unfortunately true. It is a continuation of a chaotic foreign policy that 
abandons allies and encourages enemies. It would appear that the main threat to 
the Pax Americana is the American bureaucracy itself. (READ MORE: NATO’s Bleak 
Future <https://spectator.org/natos-bleak-future/> )

Foreign policy flip flops, the lack of a cohesive long-term strategy and 
abandonment of allies should come to an end first and foremost in the interest 
of the United States, and certainly also to the benefit of pro-American 
countries such as Albania and Kosovo, that continue to suffer, quite unjustly.

Strong political 
<https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/08/the-great-realignment.php>  
leadership is needed in the United States in order to prevent the unaccountable 
bureaucratic hand from setting policy and enforcing their will. Only a 
cohesive, realist foreign policy 
<https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/10/14/getting_real_about_foreign_policy_realism_609785.html>
 , coupled with common sense, Reaganite fusionist policies domestically, can 
restore American leadership on the world stage, and prevent a Chinese century. 

 Nikola Kedhi is an economic expert and geopolitical commentator, co-author of 
the Constitution of the Center-Right Values in Albania 
<https://europeanconservative.com/articles/essay/the-constitution-of-center-right-valuesa-blueprint-for-the-restoration-of-the-right/>
 , and contributor to several media outlets in the U.S., the U.K., and Europe. 
Kedhi’s articles reflect solely his own opinions.

 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/0b9901da1f93%2419bfe170%244d3fa450%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to