dw.com <https://www.dw.com/en/whats-behind-serbias-rearmament/a-70712413>  


What's behind Serbia's rearmament?


Alexander Rhotert

8–10 minutes

  _____  

Is Serbia <https://www.dw.com/en/serbia/t-19068624>  planning to destabilize 
neighbors Kosovo <https://www.dw.com/en/kosovo/t-19111797>  and 
Bosnia-Herzegovina <https://www.dw.com/en/bosnia-and-herzegovina/t-39898509>  
or even to launch a military attack?

Both Kosovo's President Vjosa Osmani and her Bosnian counterpart Denis 
Becirovic have recently warned about such a scenario.

In a television interview in September, Osmani said that there is hope for the 
Western Balkans 
<https://www.dw.com/en/the-berlin-process-10-years-of-hope-and-disillusionment/a-70452224>
  to join the EU <https://www.dw.com/en/european-union-eu/t-17440066>  and NATO 
<https://www.dw.com/en/nato/t-19016346> , "but the precondition for this is to 
treat Serbia for what it is: a satellite state of Russia that is deepening its 
military, economic and political cooperation with Russia 
<https://www.dw.com/en/russias-influence-overshadows-serbias-election/a-67744235>
 ."

Becirovic's warning about Serbia's territorial inclinations, which he issued at 
the United Nations <https://www.dw.com/en/united-nations-un/t-17440154>  
General Assembly in New York at the end of September, was even more insistent.

Vjosa Osmani, president of Kosovo, has warned that Serbia is 'a satellite state 
of Russia that is deepening its military, economic and political cooperation 
with Russia'Image: Lev Radin/ZUMA Press/picture alliance 

He said: "Here, at the podium of the UN General Assembly, I want to publicly 
warn the global audience that, once again, the leadership of [the] Republic of 
Serbia is threatening the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and 
Herzegovina."


Belgrade's 'shopping spree for weapons'


It is a fact that Belgrade <https://www.dw.com/en/belgrade/t-38735232>  has for 
years been investing massively in its armed forces, buying modern weaponry such 
as French fighter jets and Russian attack helicopters, which Serbian President 
Aleksandar Vucic has praised as "flying tanks."

It has also purchased Chinese air defense systems, which were flown from 
Beijing to Belgrade shortly after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine 
<https://www.dw.com/en/russias-war-in-ukraine/t-60931789> .

There have also been reports that Serbia has acquired from Iran thousands of 
drones of the kind used by Russia to target Ukrainian cities on a daily basis.

The British business magazine The Economist wrote in 2021 that Belgrade's 
"shopping spree for weapons" was making its neighbors nervous.


Serbia stockpiles weapons


The renowned Stockholm International Peace Research Institute noted in 2022 
that at €1.3 billion ($1.4 billion), Belgrade's defense budget was ten times 
bigger than that of Kosovo.

Serbia's military predominance in the region is illustrated by its 250-strong 
fleet of battle tanks, which is more than in all other former Yugoslav 
republics put together (by way of comparison, Germany's armed forces have 295 
tanks).



Serbia's neighbors — in particular Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina — are 
concerned about Serbia's rearmamentImage: Thomas Brey/dpa/picture alliance 

Croatia <https://www.dw.com/en/croatia/t-39744629>  is second in the former 
Yugoslavia with 75, Bosnia third with 45 and North Macedonia 
<https://www.dw.com/en/north-macedonia/t-40246215>  fourth with 31. Neither 
Montenegro nor Kosovo have any tanks at all.

This is one reason why Kosovo's small, but growing armed forces were equipped 
with Turkish Bayraktar drones last year and 250 US Javelin anti-tank weapon 
systems this year.

Without these two weapons systems, which the Ukrainian army is successfully 
deploying in its fight against Russia, Ukraine in its current independent form 
would no longer exist.


The 'Serb World' project


This raises the question as to why Belgrade has been stockpiling so many 
weapons in recent years without being under threat from its neighbors. Is 
President Vucic planning to attack Serbia's neighbors, as suggested by the 
president of Kosovo?

Declarations, threats and the actions of Serbia's leadership would appear to 
back up this claim.

Serbia's leadership is pushing a project known as "Serb World" — a slightly 
watered down version of former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic's "Greater 
Serbia" ideology — which has met with a positive response from Serbs in 
neighboring Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina.



The 'Serb World' idea being pushed by Serbia's current leaders is highly 
reminiscent of the 'Greater Serbia' ideology of former Serbian President 
Slobodan Milosevic (pictured here, right, in June 1999)Image: picture 
alliance/dpa 

Milosevic died in 2006 in his cell at the detention center of the UN war crimes 
tribunal in the Hague. To reach his nationalistic objective for Serbia — namely 
to unite all Serb-inhabited regions of former Yugoslavia — Milosevic started 
four wars in the 1990s that killed 130,000 people.

Several high-ranking members of Serbia's government served under Milosevic, 
including President Aleksandar Vucic and Interior Minister Ivica Dacic, both of 
whom at one point led Milosevic's propaganda team.


All-Serb Assembly


In early June, President Vucic led an "All-Serb Assembly," which was attended 
by representatives of Serbian communities in the countries of the former 
Yugoslavia. The slogan of the assembly, which was held in Belgrade, was "Serbia 
and Republika Srpska 
<https://www.dw.com/en/what-is-republika-srpska/a-64373205>  — One people, one 
assembly."

It was a strategic assembly that formulated a declaration that could be 
described as the implementation plan for "Serb World."

The declaration describes Kosovo as an inalienable part of Serbia. It also 
speaks of the "united national interest of the Serbian people." 



Serbia's President Aleksandar Vucic organized the All-Serb Assembly in Belgrade 
last June. It was attended by ethnic Serbs from all countries of the former 
YugoslaviaImage: Darko Vojinovic/AP/dpa/picture alliance 

A spokesperson for the German Foreign Office in Berlin issued an unusually 
strong condemnation, saying that the German government considered the 
declaration "very worrying and damaging for Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia and all 
countries in the Western Balkans."

Becirovic commented on the June 8 assembly in Belgrade in his speech to the UN 
<https://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/79/ba_en.pdf> 

, saying that its declaration was "destructive" and that it was "not just a 
declarative act, but a dangerous greater-state program document that threatens 
the Dayton Peace Agreement 
<https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-the-dayton-accords-could-only-do-so-much/a-55938718>
  and the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina."


Is war on the horizon?


None of the neighboring countries that would appear to be the focus of 
Belgrade's territorial interests has armed forces that are ready for war.

Without the protection of the two Western peace missions in the region — the 
NATO forces in Kosovo (KFOR) 
<https://www.dw.com/en/kosovos-kurti-wants-more-nato-troops-amid-serbia-tensions/a-64257563>
  and the EU-led EUFOR/Althea force in Bosnia — they would be easy prey for any 
aggressive expansionism on Belgrade's part.

In recent years, several Serbian troop buildups on the Kosovo border 
<https://www.dw.com/en/us-urges-serbia-to-pull-back-troops-from-kosovo-border/a-66967770>
  and an attack by a Serbian paramilitary unit on Kosovo's security forces 
<https://www.dw.com/en/kosovo-monastery-siege-ends-with-4-dead/a-66909234>  
caused unrest and tension 
<https://www.dw.com/en/germany-vows-security-support-amid-kosovo-serbia-tensions/a-68180552>
 . It was with just such Serbian paramilitary attacks that the war in Croatia 
began in 1991 and a year later in Bosnia.


The role of Republika Srpska


It is possible that Belgrade was testing the water. However, the response from 
both the US and NATO was swift and unequivocal, and Belgrade backed down.

Washington intervened again in August, this time in the form of William Burns, 
director of the CIA, who traveled to Bosnia-Herzegovina specifically to put a 
stop to the separatist activities of Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik.



Increased tension between Kosovo and Serbia has on occasion led to border 
closures between the two countries in recent yearsImage: Visar 
Kryeziu/dpa/AP/picture alliance 

Dodik has already taken several steps towards declaring the independence of 
Republika Srpska and armed thousands of members of paramilitary organizations.

Politicians in the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, are preparing for the eventuality 
that Republika Srpska could push for secession. Should this lead to an armed 
conflict and if the Bosnian Serbs come under military pressure, it is entirely 
probable that Belgrade could send its tanks to Bosnia to support the Bosnian 
Serbs.

A new war in the Balkans cannot, therefore, be excluded.


How would a Trump administration respond?


It is completely unclear how the US would respond to such a situation under a 
Trump administration 
<https://www.dw.com/en/how-us-election-outcome-could-affect-the-western-balkans/a-70367944>
 . One hotly tipped candidate for the post of Secretary of State under Trump is 
the former US ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell.

Grenell and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, have major business interests in 
Serbia.

This article was originally published in German and adapted by Aingeal Flanagan.

 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/13e801db30fc%24365e1970%24a31a4c50%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to