Mike confused me by saying:
<<It is a tri-y with 1 and 4 and 2 and 3 paired up unsted of 1 and 2 and
3 and 4 being pair like before. This gives a wider powerband with no
sacrifice in top end power.>>
Mike, unlike you, I had an Arkansas education. When you put all those
"and"s in there, it gives me the hicups when I have to talk out loud to
read.
For the dumb guys (like me) who had to read this thing 6 times to
understand it, I will translate it into "Southernise":
<<It is a tri-y with (1 & 4) and (2 & 3) paired up instead of (1 & 2)
and (3 & 4) being pair like before. This gives a wider powerband with no
sacrifice in top end power.>>
That kicks ass, Mike. What are the est. damages to the ole pocket book
going to be?
Brought up on a Bill Clinton education,
ST3
http://www.geocities.com/ST3_200/ST3.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Non-performance related topics?
http://www.egroups.com/group/NissanHotBodies
