Terrin wrote:
>NO NO NO. I did not say the Hotshot was compared to the PR. There wasn't
>even a GA16DE there that day. You said in your testing that the Hotshot
>one
>was being redesigned with 2.5" piping instead of 3" piping, which yielded
>better results. The PR one uses 3" piping for the GA16DE too right? I
>didn't say there was a difference between the two on the SR20DE other than
>that the price difference and the way it looks.
>
>Wait a minute Mike. You said yourself that the new Hotshot design was
>better than the old design. Right? You use different piping for the new
>design right? In the old design, Hotshot was basically using a SR20DE CAI
>adapted for a GA16DE right? So was PR. That's why I assumed that since
>the
>new design yielded better results, the old Hotshot and the PR would have
>similar gains.
Ok sorry, I thought you were talking SR20 insted of GA for that comparison.
For the SR20 there is no consistant significant difference. For the new GA
Hotshot with the stepped tube design, it is better.
mIKE
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have a question? Don't forget to check <http://www.sentra.net/>.
