Why is so much written about this without much real content? How many more or 
less rhetoric questions with or without answers because our patients and their 
diseases and severity actually vary... OOOPS who'd have thought that!? For 
example 'where severe sepsis belongs' will depend on seeing the patient as a 
clinician in addition to certain quite clear severity criteria in their context 
and conjunction e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, resp rate, urine output, lab 
signs of organ failure, lactate, central venous sats if available), and to 
decide how severe the whole situation is and thus how much monitoring and 
support a specific patient in a specific situation and severity needs. How many 
more mails and how many more pages of guidelines and time and expense of 
development of these guidelines by experts do we need for this and how many not 
always sufficiently evidence based but dictatorial bundles, which then get 
overtaken by the scientific evidence (e.g APC, steroids)??? Back t
 o the shopfloor (and the floor or the ICU according to the real need) and back 
to basics, and back to applying good medicine and good science for each 
individual patient and his or her specific situation rather than being spoonfed 
and dictated bundle criteria from some "institute" without sufficient robust 
and durable scientific evidence...

 
Doris Doberenz FRCA FFICM EDAIC EDA
Consultant
Intensive Care Unit and Anaesthetic Department
Charing Cross Hospital
Fulham Palace Rd
London W6 8RF
Tel 020 3311 1234 bleep 5742
Mobile 07855 754 160









-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Townsend, 
Sean, M.D.
Sent: 15 March 2013 06:32
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Where Does Severe Sepsis Belong?

It's been a long time since I've had to ask this question. I used to think I 
knew the answer.

Here it is: do all patients who meet severe sepsis criteria need to be admitted 
to the ICU ?

Examples:

1. Pneumonia, fever, tachycardia, INR 1.5.
2. Cellulitis, leukocytosis, fever, creatinine 2.0.
3. UTI, leukocytosis, fever, lactate 3.0.

Where do people put these patients in reality? What mind of monitoring do they 
deserve?

By prevailing bundles, each gets lactate checked, blood cultures, broad 
spectrum antibiotics. That's it. Good enough? Good enough for the floor? Need 
the ICU? Why?

Sean


Sean R. Townsend, M.D.
Vice President of Quality & Safety
California Pacific Medical Center
2330 Clay Street, #301
San Francisco, CA 94115
email [email protected]
office (415) 600-5770
fax (415) 600-1541
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust notice: The contents of 
this
e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address 
to
which it is addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not 
the
addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, disclose or
otherwise use it in any form whatsoever. If you have received this
e-mail in error please telephone the Imperial College Healthcare 
NHS
Trust on +44 (0)20 3311 3311 and ask for the person who sent 
you the
email. Please also delete the message from your computer. [end]
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to