Couldn't agree more.

Ron 

Dr Ron Daniels
Chair: UK Sepsis Trust
CEO: Global Sepsis Alliance

Sent on the move from my iPhone, excuse brevity!

> On 30 Oct 2013, at 14:02, Yash Javeri <dryashjav...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Very well said Richard.
> Each has it's one place.
> Both have different purpose.
> Judicious use of both is required in a serial way.
> 
>> On 30-Oct-2013, at 17:39, richardlevra...@comcast.net wrote:
>> 
>> Apples and oranges.  Lactate is a marker for tissue perfusion and time to 
>> clearance of lactate is linked to risk of mortality.  Procalcitonin is 
>> helpful for identifying bacterial infection and potentially for 
>> de-escalating abx therapy.  If you're designing a protocol for sepsis you 
>> can get by without a procalcitonin level, but lactate is a mainstay and 
>> critically important. 
>> Short answer...LACTATE.
>> 
>> Rich Levrault DO
>> Intensivist
>> Holyoke Medical Center
>> 
>> From: "Jody L Edwards" <jodyledwa...@health-partners.org>
>> To: Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:07:02 AM
>> Subject: [Sepsis Groups] procalcitonin
>> 
>> <image001.jpg>
>> Our physician group is looking at procalcitonin levels vs lactic acid levels 
>> as which one is a more accurate biomarker for severe sepsis and septic 
>> shock. Has anyone completed a study regarding this issue. Any comments would 
>> be greatly appreciated.
>>  
>> Thank you,
>> Jody
>>  
>> Jody Edwards MSN, RN
>> Sepsis PI Coordinator
>> Springfield Regional Medical Center
>> 100 Medical Dr. 45504
>> 937-523-5268
>> jodyledwa...@health-partners.org
>>  
>> “Education will never be as expensive as ignorance”-Anonymous
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> “Confidential – Quality Improvement Information”
>> "CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message, including any attachments, is for 
>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
>> privileged information. 
>> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If 
>> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply 
>> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>> Privileged and Confidential Quality/Peer Review Document  Pursuant to Ohio 
>> Revised Code  2305.24, 2305.25., 2305.251, 2305.252, and 2305.253."
>>  
>>  
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for the 
>> sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
>> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
>> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
>> message. 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>> Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sepsisgroups mailing list
>> Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
>> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sepsisgroups mailing list
> Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
Sepsisgroups@lists.sepsisgroups.org
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to