Phil and Terry,

Am I off base here?

To me, and the clinicians at our institution, it is often not so much the 
volume, but the rate of infusion and how promptly to deliver the volume that is 
the controversy. And there is a very active debate at our institution on this.

I suggest that 999 ml/kg is largely an inadequate rate. Our surgical 
intensivists totally support boluses administered by pressure bag and at a 
minimum wide open going in fast.

However, many of our medical intensivists and nurses seem to believe that 999 
ml/hr is acceptable and even ideal.  It makes sense to me that sometimes 999 is 
ok, sometimes,

but often it is inadequate and puts the patient at risk for remaining in a 
state of hypo perfusion. And even if fluid overload is a concern rapid bolus, 
with assessment after each is in order in septic shock and severe sepsis.

g

George Kramer, PhD
UTMB

OvidSP Results<message:%[email protected]%3E>
From: <Dellinger>, Phil 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:54 AM
To: Hesham Hassaballa 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Initial Fluid Bolus

Probably the best thing to do. And definitely simpler than trying to figure out 
a more precise fluid load estimate. I addressed this issue with the primary 
investigators and research coordinators for the EUPHRATES trial(for which I am 
the PI for the international trial). We are looking at endotoxin removal with 
hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock identified to have high endotoxin 
activity.  One of the entry criteria, which also includes a certain level of 
vasopressor support, is 30 ml/kg actual body weight of crystalloid(or colloid 
equivalent) fluid resuscitation.

“From a purist standpoint, fluid bolus in obese septic shock patients should be 
somewhat less per kg than in someone who is normal body habitus since the 
intravascular volume expands at a somewhat lower  % as body weight increases in 
the obese patient. However no one has ever used, in septic shock research 
trials, formulas that are available but not well validated to adjust for blood 
volume in the obese patient..”


From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hesham 
Hassaballa
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 9:33 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Initial Fluid Bolus

I'm using actual body weight, and it works out very well. I think if we use 
ideal body weight, it will under resuscitate the patient.

Hesham A. Hassaballa, MD
Program Medical Director
Critical Care
Rush-Copley Medical Center
2000 Ogden Avenue
Aurora, IL 60504
Phone: (331) 454-6572

### CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ###
This message and any included attachments are from Cogent HMG and are intended 
only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential 
information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized 
forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is 
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please 
promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by 
e-mail or contact the Cogent HMG Privacy Officer at 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

### CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ###

This message and any included attachments are from Cogent HMG and are intended 
only for the addressee. The contents in this message contain confidential 
information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. Unauthorized 
forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is 
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please 
promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by 
e-mail or contact the Cogent HMG Privacy Officer at 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.   ­­

**************************************************************** This 
communication, including attachments, may contain information that is 
confidential. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed 
only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this 
communication is not the intended recipient, employee, or agent of the intended 
recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, or 
you believe that you have received this communication in error, please notify 
the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and promptly delete this 
e-mail, including attachments without reading them or saving them in any 
manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of 
this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to