There is a thread of confusion in this string.  As regards consensus 
definitions of shock, lactate > 4 has long been considered a criterion when 
accompanied by all the other criteria meeting severe sepsis.

Are their differential considerations? Of course.

Please be assured, however, experts in the campaign and those who devised the 
core measure didn't inadvertently include lactate as a criterion for shock.  
This is very unlikely to be seriously challenged or changed.


On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Stephanie Wilson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:

Thank you for the link and your response.

We have had conversation with the physicians at our facility about the value 
and appropriate use of Lactate levels.

However, it is still part of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and we're stuck with 
Lactate levels being part of the criteria for determining Septic Shock in the 
Core Measures world, at least for the time being.

How are others dealing with a perceived discrepancy between current literature 
and the Sepsis Core Measure guidelines?




Not everything that counts can be counted,
and not everything that can be counted counts.


Stephanie Wilson, BSN

Jordan Valley Medical Center
Quality Reviewer/Core Measures
3870 West 9000 South
West Jordan, Utah  84088

Office    801.561.8888 xt. 4526
Cell       801.580.8320
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



From:        [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To:        "Harkey,Jessica" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:        sepsisgroups 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
 "Tribuiani,        Barbara" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date:        11/17/2015 06:55 AM
Subject:        Re: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Present
Sent by:        "Sepsisgroups" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
________________________________



This is the consensus definition of septic shock.It’s not about lab results but 
rather response to fluid.

"Septic shock: sepsis with persisting arterial hypotension or hypoperfusion 
despite adequate fluid resuscitation.”

Lactic acid is a measure of tissue hypoxia indicating severe sepsis defined as 
sepsis with organ dysfunction, hypotension or hypoperfusion.  This is a good 
reference showing all of the lab indicators and their meaning.

http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/infectious-disease/sepsis/

Lewis Holmes, MD, MPH
Porter Medical Center

On Nov 13, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Harkey,Jessica 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

This patient has already coded out with a sepsis diagnosis, therefore the 
elevated lactate would be the criteria for septic shock. The way I understand 
the intent of the treatment, the measure and criteria, is that even if there 
were other types of lactic acidosis, the sepsis will more than likely be higher 
risk of mortality therefore treat the septic shock without delaying while other 
sources of lactic acidosis are considered. So infection + SIRS+ shock (lactate 
>4)= implement the bundle timely and treat sepsis first regardless of other 
potential sources of lactate. Then evaluate after the bundle has been completed.
Jessica Harkey, MSN, RN, ACCNS, CCRN
Sepsis Program Coordinator
San Joaquin Community Hospital

Sent from my iPad using Mail+ for Outlook<http://taps.io/mailplus>

From: Mary ann David
Sent: 11/12/15, 9:48 PM
To: 'Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann', 'Tribuiani, Barbara', sepsisgroups
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Present
However, there are other reasons lactate can be elevated but not septic shock 
such as cardiac arrest, ischemia, burns, liver failure, etc. Shouldn’t those be 
considered?

Thanks,
Mary Ann David, MSN, RN, CNS, ACNS-BC
Clinical Nurse Specialist, MICU/SICU/RRT
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center
Tel. No. 619-502-3165
Hospital Cell No. 619-502-5578
Pager No. 619-688-7124
Fax. No. 619-502-4076
Email. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:30 AM
To: 'Tribuiani, Barbara'; 
'[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Present

Physician documentation is used only if the other criteria are not found.
In this case, severe sepsis is present – so the Lactate of 4.3 = septic shock

Thanks,

MARY ANN BARNES-DALY RN BSN CCRN DC  | Clinical Performance Improvement 
Consultant
Sutter Health - Office of Patient Experience | 2200 River Plaza Drive, 
Sacramento, CA 95833
Mobile 916.200.5604| Office 916.286.6717  | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, 
build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”         ~R. 
Buckminster Fuller

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Tribuiani, Barbara
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:21 AM
To: 
'[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Septic Shock Present

Hello All-

I have a patient who meets criteria for septic shock due to the initial lactate 
of 4.3 however the physicians clearly document that the patient has “severe 
sepsis without shock” How do I answer the question “septic shock present” in 
this case??

Thank you,
Barb

Barbara Tribuiani, RN, BSN
Quality Improvement Department
Phone: 610-237-4208
Fax: 610-237-4264

T Together
E Everyone
A Achieves
M More


Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Trinity Health and is 
intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain 
information that is privileged and confidential.  Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender regarding the 
error in a separate email.
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to