Karen,
I disagree and would continue to look for documentation that it is in fact 
organ dysfunction related to sepsis. Cholecystitis is not necessarily an 
infection and an elevated bilirubin is not necessarily organ dysfunction.

Dena
Dena Videtic RN BSN
Quality Indicators
Doctors Hospital
786-308-3315

From: Belfi, Karen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:26 AM
To: Greg Stanford <[email protected]>; Dena Videtic <[email protected]>
Cc: Murray, Sandra <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsis Question on organ dysfunction

If we are reviewing concurrently that would be helpful.
However, if we are retroactively abstracting a chart, we can only go by 
documentation in the chart.
The specification manual is clear that if there is no documentation the organ 
dysfunction isn’t documented as related to a different condition, we are to use 
it as organ dysfunction criterion.
It may not always make sense clinically, but we need to follow the guidelines.

Karen Belfi, RN, MSN
Quality Outcomes Coordinator
Lankenau Medical Center
484-476-8092
Pager: 5240
[cid:25FFED76-F7F0-4047-910F-0D7077ED1E1E]

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Greg Stanford
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 9:40 PM
To: Dena Videtic
Cc: Murray, Sandra; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsis Question on organ dysfunction

I agree with Dena.  Cholecystitis doesn’t generally give you a bili that high, 
and I would think of obstruction and cholangitis.  Without that, sepsis would 
be next on my list. but I would query the doctor to better understand his/her 
clinical impression.

Greg Stanford, MD
Medical Director
Clinical Documentation Improvement and Outcomes

1840 Amherst Street | Winchester, Va 22601
Phone: (540) 596 4999   Cell: 540 664 5736  | 
|[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential, may be legally privileged, 
and for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, forwarding 
and distribution by any means is strictly prohibited. If received in error, do 
not read but delete and e-mail confirmation to the sender.



On Jul 5, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Dena Videtic 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Sandra,
This is a good question. From an abstraction point of view, I would look for 
physician documentation that the patient has Severe Sepsis because as nurses, 
it is not in our scope of practice to diagnose patients. The bilirubin could be 
elevated due to a biliary obstruction. An interesting article was published in 
April about the subjectivity of sepsis diagnosis even among physicians. If 
you’re interested it is called: ‘Diagnosing Sepsis is Subjective and Highly 
Variable: A Survey of Intensivists Using Case Vignettes” 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822273/


Dena Videtic RN BSN
Quality Indicators
Doctors Hospital
Coral Gables, FL
786-308-3315

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Sandra
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 2:26 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsis Question on organ dysfunction

Would you count a t.bili of 9.3 as organ dysfunction if patient comes in with 
abdominal pain, meets the SIRS criteria and the CT shows pt to have acute 
cholecystitis?


Sandra Murray, RN, BSN | Heart Failure & Sepsis Program Coordinator
Performance Improvement-Patient Safety and Risk
T 817.848.4963 | M 682.367.3032
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

<image001.png>

Follow us on Social Media

This document was generated by, or was prepared by or at the direction or 
request of a medical committee, medical peer review committee, nursing peer 
review committee, and/or patient safety committee, including a joint committee, 
of Texas Health Resources and its member hospitals as defined under Texas 
Health & Safety Code Sec. 161.031, et seq., Texas Occ. Code Secs. 151.001, et 
seq., 160.001, et seq. and 303.001, et seq., and is used for committee 
purposes, specifically, quality assurance and assessment and the evaluation of 
patient safety and medical and healthcare services at the Hospital.  This 
document and the information contained within it are considered confidential, 
privileged and not subject to court subpoena pursuant to the above-cited 
statutes and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 11101, et seq.


The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended only 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may 
contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, and exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
prohibited from copying, distributing, or using the information. Please contact 
the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message from 
your system.

________________________________
This message originates from Baptist Health South Florida (BHSF). It contains 
information that may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the 
individuals or entity named above. It is prohibited for anyone else to 
disclose, copy, distribute or use the contents of this message. This message 
may not be copied or distributed without this disclaimer. All personal messages 
express views solely of the sender, which are not to be attributed to BHSF. If 
you received this message in error, please notify us immediately at 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. BHSF scanned 
this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org




_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to