> That's a good question. I'm not sure if all databases have the *same > temporary table semantics*. If they do, an integration test could be > added. If not, you can add adapter tests that are specific per > adapter.
not at all, I will do some adapter-specific tests. But the main issue is: if you add another adapter for a database not supporting temporary tables or with custom syntax, you will have to explicitly override TEMPORARY constant in this adapter and make a specific test. I don't think it's a big deal... Florent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
