On Apr 16, 10:36 am, Florent <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a good question. I'm not sure if all databases have the *same > > temporary table semantics*. If they do, an integration test could be > > added. If not, you can add adapter tests that are specific per > > adapter. > > not at all, I will do some adapter-specific tests. > But the main issue is: if you add another adapter for a database not > supporting temporary tables or with custom syntax, you will have to > explicitly override TEMPORARY constant in this adapter and make a > specific test. > I don't think it's a big deal...
Florent's branch has been merged with some changes, so temporary table support is now in the master branch. Jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
