On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Jeremy Evans wrote: > Is there a reason you are using both an implicit table alias and an > explicit table alias? I'm just curious.
eager graphing/loading a many_to_many association always passes a table_alias in. > I think the better solution would be to handle the situation inside > join_table, maybe by ignoring the explicit alias if there is an > implicit alias. What do you think? Doing it in join_table sounds good to me. In my case, the implicit and explicit aliases are exactly the same. Perhaps the behavior should be ignoring the implicit alias and always using the explicit alias if given? Cheers, Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
