On Aug 24, 10:01 am, Mike Luu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > > Is there a reason you are using both an implicit table alias and an > > explicit table alias? I'm just curious. > > eager graphing/loading a many_to_many association always passes a table_alias > in.
And you are aliasing the model as well. That would certianly cause this. > > > I think the better solution would be to handle the situation inside > > join_table, maybe by ignoring the explicit alias if there is an > > implicit alias. What do you think? > > Doing it in join_table sounds good to me. In my case, the implicit and > explicit aliases are exactly the same. Perhaps the behavior should be > ignoring the implicit alias and always using the explicit alias if given? Especially with eager_graph, that's what you'd want to do. Inside join_table, we should check for either a symbol or an aliased expression and remove any aliases. This needs to happen for both the table being joined and the last joined table (which uses the :implicit_qualifier option IIRC). Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
