On Mar 21, 4:13 pm, elskwid <[email protected]> wrote: > You mention 'least surprise' but I would contend that modifying Sequel > in such a way is more surprising than having some Ruby code that any > rubyist would be able to understand.
Hi Don, forum, I hate to keep harping on this, but I've been mulling over what you said. That is, that modifying Sequel in such a way is more surprising than having some Ruby code that any rubyist would be able to understand. Would it be such a troubling thing if Sequel could optionally disable implicit dataset assignments? It would be a matter of specifying the option when defining a model. Surely the following example is naive, but here it is: base.rb.diff : https://gist.github.com/882106 model.rb.diff : https://gist.github.com/882096 Now, one could define models in this manner : https://gist.github.com/882096 Just an idea. :-\ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
