Hi there We've been evaluating the use of Sequel with SQL Server, and as poart of this we've been benchmarking Sequel against AR.
We're using JRuby, and Torquebox as our application server for all tests. We are using Sinatra as our web framework and Apache Bench to run the tests. A SQL Server 2008 R2 instance is being used for the tests. Our benchmark test is very simple, return all rows in a table and print them to the standard output. The test table has 72 rows. AR BENCHMARK RESULTS Requests per second: 182.08 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 54.922 [ms] (mean) SEQUEL BENCHMARK RESULTS Requests per second: 8.72 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 1146.993 [ms] (mean) I've extracted the relevant Sequel code, here: https://gist.github.com/1385695 I am trying to understand why Sequel seems to be doing so poorly and I'm hoping someone can tell me where I might be introducing an issue, or where I might be able to improve things. Apologies in advance if the code is not super, I've only been using Ruby a few months :) Cheers, Ciaran -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
