Thanks! On Nov 24, 8:28 pm, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 1:58 am, Ciaran Archer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jeremy > > > Since I'm using JRuby because I don't want to use Java, I think I will > > leave the type conversion on, and for now just watch the column > > count :) > > > SEQUEL BENCHMARK RESULTS (TYPE CONVERSION ON, ALL COLS, MASTER BRANCH) > > Requests per second: 128.81 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 77.633 [ms] (mean) > > > Compared to the original test: > > > ORIGINAL SEQUEL BENCHMARK RESULTS > > Requests per second: 8.72 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 1146.993 [ms] (mean) > > > And the original AR test: > > > ORIGINAL ACTIVE RECORD BENCHMARK RESULTS > > Requests per second: 182.08 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 54.922 [ms] (mean) > > For a fairer benchmark, you could either restrict the selected columns > to only the columns you need, or you should iterate over all selected > columns so that ActiveRecord needs to do the same type conversion that > Sequel does. But it's good to see that even if the worst case > scenario, Sequel is now at least close in performance. > > > One final question: when will the master branch make it in the the > > latest gem release? > > Sequel releases once per month, in the first few days of the month. > The next release (3.30.0) is planned for December 1. > > Thanks, > Jeremy
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
