Thanks Jeremy! That worked great. I was just about to come back here to post that I had just tried out a whole slew of permutations on the `class: :Model` option... But hadn't realized I should rename the association itself.
Thank you so much for your quick and zesty help. It's crazy, and very much appreciated! On Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 9:28:03 AM UTC-6, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > On Thursday, January 4, 2018 at 7:23:11 AM UTC-8, Tim Tilberg wrote: >> >> I fear the answer to this question will simply be "Don't use the class >> name `Model`" -- I'd like to avoid this, as the word Model is the most >> meaningful in our context, and is largely established in the greater system. >> > > You can use the class name Model, but you shouldn't use the association > name model, as that overrides Sequel::Model#model in a way that breaks > Sequel::Model. You can probably do: > > Submodel.many_to_one :parent_model, :class=>:Model > > Thanks, > Jeremy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sequel-talk@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
