On Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 1:32:19 PM UTC-8, Ben Alavi wrote: > > Oh yeah good point, hadn't considered that. I'll look into adding an > option based on how they are used elsewhere. > > In that case should it also emit a deprecation for the current behavior > when given a qualified identifier? >
It's probably too soon to add a deprecation warning. I'm not positive that the default behavior will change, I'll make that decision closer to the release of Sequel 6 (which is probably at least 3 years from now). > And would it also need an option for the future to restore the original > behavior? Or would it be minor enough to just drop it altogether? > At this point, I don't think so. If we add the deprecation warning, we might support an option keep the current behavior, in which case it can be added at that point. Thanks, Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sequel-talk@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
