Hi, I have a question regarding the generic type conversion for JDBC Array types.
The java examples I've seen do a further getArray call on the object returned by resultset.getArray(column) java.sql.Array array = rs.getArray(columnIndex); if (array == null) { return true; } Object o = array.getArray(); It looks like the postgres jdbc adapter does the correct thing. # Return PostgreSQL array types as ruby Arrays instead of # JDBC PostgreSQL driver-specific array type. Only used if the # database does not have a conversion proc for the type. ARRAY_METHOD = Object.new def ARRAY_METHOD.call(r, i) if v = r.getArray(i) v.array.to_ary end end However, it looks like the generic jdbc adapter only calls getArray(column) %w'Object Array String Time Date Timestamp BigDecimal Blob Bytes Clob' .each do |meth| x = convertors[meth.to_sym] = Object.new class_eval("def x.call(r, i) r.get#{meth}(i) end", __FILE__, __LINE__) end Before I create an issue in github, I wanted to check if there is a reason for not making the postgres specific handling the default for all of JDBC. Thanks, Guy Boertje Elastic/Logstash -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sequel-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/5fef5f58-8f7c-4cc3-bc51-292d43f1c583%40googlegroups.com.