Emmanuel, I'm implementing a very simple LoadBalancer. It is very specific to my application and I'm not sure that it can interest someone.
I'm implementing a LoadBalancer of type Master-Slave. All the requests Reads/writes are sent to the master and asynchronously forwarded to the slave. The communication with the mater is sure (local) but the communication with the slave is not sure (remote). With this new LoadBalancer, even is the communication with the slave is lost, all is OK. And my application is not impacted. I previously tested the Raidb1 loadBalancer but sometimes after having killed the slave, my application hung or I have "null". Best regards, Xavier. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Cecchet Sent: vendredi 27 octobre 2006 16:58 To: Sequoia general mailing list Subject: Re: [Sequoia] NPE in abstractscheduler.addSusbpendedRequest Xavier, > Unfortunately, I cannot configure the database throw JMX because > I have to implement my own LoadBalancer. > You should either add a new load balancer in the DTD and parser, or even simpler replace the implementation of an existing load balancer. Could you tell us what kind of load balancing policy you are developing that is not addressed by the current load balancers? Are you willing to contribute this back in the Sequoia source tree? Thanks for your feedback, Emmanuel _______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia _______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list [email protected] https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
