Hi all,
I am trying to setup Sequoia over two PostgreSQL backends to provide a HA
default datasource to a JBoss cluster.
I want two Sequoia controllers so as to avoid a single point of failure.
I only have 2 backends, which I want to setup in a RAIDb-1 fashion.
Is it OK if they are each on a separate controller?
Controller1 -> backend1
Controller2 -> backend2
Will the following configuration for the RequestManager still be alright?
<RequestManager>
<RequestScheduler>
<RAIDb-1Scheduler level="passThrough"/>
</RequestScheduler>
<LoadBalancer>
<RAIDb-1>
<WaitForCompletion policy="first"/>
<RAIDb-1-LeastPendingRequestsFirst/>
</RAIDb-1>
</LoadBalancer>
[...]
</RequestManager>
Thank you in advance,
Lionel
___________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son
interface révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
Sequoia@lists.forge.continuent.org
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
