Lionel Capiez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all,I am trying to setup Sequoia over two PostgreSQL backends to provide a > HA default datasource to a JBoss cluster. I want two Sequoia controllers so > as to avoid a single point of failure.I only have 2 backends, which I want to > setup in a RAIDb-1 fashion. Is it OK if they are each on a separate > controller? Controller1 -> backend1Controller2 -> backend2Will the following > configuration for the RequestManager still be alright? <RequestManager> > <RequestScheduler> <RAIDb-1Scheduler level="passThrough"/> > </RequestScheduler> <LoadBalancer> <RAIDb-1> > <WaitForCompletion policy="first"/> > <RAIDb-1-LeastPendingRequestsFirst/> </RAIDb-1> > </LoadBalancer> [...] </RequestManager>Thank you in advance,Lionel > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes > sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses._______________________________________________
"each controller must have its own set of backends and no backends should be shared between controllers" <http://sequoia.continuent.org/doc/2.10/userGuide/ar01s07.html> _______________________________________________ Sequoia mailing list Sequoia@lists.forge.continuent.org https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
