[ 
https://forge.continuent.org/jira/browse/SEQUOIA-1050?page=comments#action_14326
 ] 

Stefan Lischke commented on SEQUOIA-1050:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks for filing this bug, i have observed this for a long time, but i thought 
it was not critical, cause the checkpoint was not created.

You think it might cause something serious?

here is my exception i always get:

-----
checkpoint with name shutdown192.168.0.114:25322 already exists!

2007-09-18 15:54:19,134 WARN  controller.virtualdatabase.messenger Error while
setting shutdown checkpoint
java.sql.SQLException: A checkpoint with name shutdown192.168.0.114:25322
already exists!
        at
org.continuent.sequoia.controller.recoverylog.RecoveryLog.storeCheckpoint(RecoveryLog.java:2573)

> Duplicate shutdown checkpoint names with non-distributed virtual databases
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: SEQUOIA-1050
>          URL: https://forge.continuent.org/jira/browse/SEQUOIA-1050
>      Project: Sequoia
>         Type: Bug

>   Components: Recovery Log, Core
>  Environment: Any non-distributed virtual database with recovery log
>     Reporter: Emmanuel Cecchet
>     Assignee: Emmanuel Cecchet
>     Priority: Critical

>
>
> The code in VirtualDatabase.setShutdownCheckpoint does not generate unique 
> checkpoint names. Shutting down the controller for the second time on the 
> same controller will generate a duplicate entry exception in the recovery log.
> The method should use buildCheckpointName("shutdown") instead like in the 
> DistributedVirtualDatabase implementation.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   https://forge.continuent.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia

Reply via email to