Is Trump Right About NATO? 

Patrick J. Buchanan

 
<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001CZx4EfZn5PlHuVHymZiQJ4Fers90Tvv68z-CmVlNyCSA
yAsfDuxpU5ZhcZzvEaUrpeVPervZEeqIqCwWzuUTSVW7CKrWT_O_pnGh4Si65BnCHS-SS8dNrIyZ
GYbRbkOccgQcJG1un6KzPSia1IcRAstFFXX6sJIoUy5Fcz6JsB-jOzm7gsVdvN5vUpbFdkuJDV5u
pPIVJmK8Y5vn4ADIgEkltO5poER-&c=4eSyNiGrbuPqF7pZtOT8_vzbuxyR0E6wA_2JMh3Hk_V0p
cQwJdCErA==&ch=_27A03r9OrTCm9vF40pldeTMLIC4qxGhvupCmIgj_JeR_hASDETPvA==>
http://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/is-trump-right-about-nato/

 

I am "not isolationist, but I am 'America First,'" Donald Trump told The New
York times last weekend. "I like the expression." Of NATO, where the U.S.
underwrites three-fourths of the cost of defending Europe, Trump calls this
arrangement "unfair, economically, to us," and adds, "We will not be ripped
off anymore." Beltway media may be transfixed with Twitter wars over wives
and alleged infidelities. But the ideas Trump aired should ignite a national
debate over U.S. overseas commitments - especially NATO. For the Donald's
ideas are not lacking for authoritative support ... Trump is challenging the
mindset of a foreign policy elite whose thinking is frozen in a world that
disappeared around 1991. He is suggesting a new foreign policy where the
United States is committed to war only when are attacked or U.S. vital
interests are imperiled.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"serbia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/serbia.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to