On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:17:26AM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: > I can definitely do it, but Aaron's being a butthead with a -1 saying it > doesn't fit the Commons' goals :-)
Naw, that's not true, I'm not saying it doesn't fit the goals. I'm saying we don't have goals to fit. > Aaron: if you say "no", then what still > needs to happen to define those goals? That's easy: 1) APR needs to finalize its mission 2) Commmons needs to finalize its mission (or have something final enough to start accepting things like Serf) > Help out here, so we can get > component adoption going. I'd like to see Commons create an "HTTP Utilities Component" and figure out what that can mean. > I believe Peter wants to start shifting a bunch of > Avalon components, too. There may be some J-C guys, too. > > But about serf specifically, I haven't seen votes on it from Ken, Jim, or > Geir. We also don't seem to have a solid consensus on CVS organization or > mailing lists. > > Hmm. Maybe we should use Subversion? We could certainly not worry about > directory organization in that case. We'd lose CVS history, though, since we > can't blend multiple CVS repositories over time. i.e. we could use cvs2svn > for an initial set, but future additions would lose history since we > couldn't "blend" them into an existing repos. > > > [grrr...] > > I think it is time to stop dicking around, complete the Commons' mission > statement, and start getting some work done. +1 -aaron
