Due to the actions of Verisign, and other abusive root domain operators, I have enhanced SenderInFakeDomain to accept a list of IP addresses that would also be rejected as fake.
Is this something that we want in CVS?
+1
One thing that bothers me is that passing a list as a configuration string is a hardcoded mechansim, whereas someone might have the same data in a file, DNS zone, etc., but that is not unique to this Matcher.
Yeah, better matcher config would be nice.
Here's a stupid idea... the first time you get a domain suffix (.net, .org) that you haven't tested before, have the code generate a random 20-30 character string, add that suffix, and look it up. Statistically it will resolve to the abusive root domain's target. Then you proceed with your check on your fake domain, and if it resolves to the same, it's pretty clearly a fake domain.
A bit off the wall, I know, but perhaps more foolproof.
-- Serge Knystautas President Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
