> > Is this something that we want in CVS?
> +1
Will check it in.
> > One thing that bothers me is that passing a list as a configuration
string
> > is a hardcoded mechansim, whereas someone might have the same data in a
> > file, DNS zone, etc., but that is not unique to this Matcher.
> Yeah, better matcher config would be nice.
One thought that I had was to have a proper interface for the data. Then we
could use JNDI configuration to provide a concrete implementation to the
matcher, e.g.,
T o = (T) new InitialContext().lookup(key);
Just like a J2EE resource.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
