I reviewed the patch when preparing for the last couple of test builds, and had some concerns as I recall. I thought I had posted them; if not, mea culpa.
IIRC, one concern had to do with changing the matching order. I also think that there is merit to possibly moving some stuff to an abstract base, and incorporating Robert Cadena's submission from April related to non-JDBC virtual user tables: http://www.machine501.com/projects/vtable_mailet. --- Noel -----Original Message----- From: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 13:09 To: James Developers List Subject: RE: JDBCVirtualUserTable Patch? Kenny, I looked at your messages (subject "[PATCH] JDBCVirtualUserTable - One-to-Many Mapping, Flexible SQL) of August 24 and 26: the patch never came through, neither as "JDBCVirtualUserTable.java.patch" nor as "JDBCVirtualUserTablePatch.jar". Try again (perhaps as a .zip?). Vincenzo > -----Original Message----- > From: Kenny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: martedi 30 settembre 2003 18.39 > To: James Developers List > Subject: JDBCVirtualUserTable Patch? > > > Hey all, > > I submitted a patch for JDBCVirtualUserTable a while back, but I haven't > heard any response (maybe I just missed the responses). Did I submit > improperly or are my changes bad, etc? I just wanted to find out so I > can make any neccessary changes and resubmit. > > Thanks, > Kenny --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
