Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Sřren Hilmer wrote: > > I agree that Andreas's DSN solution should make it into > > the next build. My only concern is that we get yet > > another processor with special meaning, besides root and > > error. I suggest that we make the processor name a > > parameter to RemoteDelivery. > > > <DSNProcessor>dsn</DSNProcessor> > > I absolutely agree. Isnt' that what we've been discussing? > I'm almost > certain that I mentioned that in one of my e-mails. > > --- Noel
Yes you mentioned this. An I'll implement it as a parameter before I submit the Mailet and a Patch for RemoteDelivery. But be patient, I'm very busy with other things at the moment. Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
