Serge Knystautas wrote: > Preface: I don't feel very strongly about this and wouldn't > veto any of > the suggestions put forward. But just to respond to some points: > > Steve Brewin wrote: > >>- it's a trademarked Sun term. > > > > I believe that JavaMail is, but javamail is not. > > <snarky> > pardon me while i xerox this note, drink a coke, and read e. e. > cummings. (http://www.poets.org/poets/poets.cfm?prmID=157 > american poet > most known by high school students writing almost all in lowercase) > </snarky>
nice! did you write that in windows or on a sun box running solaris? In truth, like you, I don't feel very strongly about this. The original intent was to find a package name convention which would indicate a set of functionality that specialized/extended JavaMail types without adding James specific dependencies. o.a.james.util.mail would do the same thing, while avoiding your concerns and those of Noel, who I recollect, wanted to avoid o.a.mail. -- steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
