nice! did you write that in windows or on a sun box running solaris?
In truth, like you, I don't feel very strongly about this. The original intent was to find a package name convention which would indicate a set of functionality that specialized/extended JavaMail types without adding James specific dependencies. o.a.james.util.mail would do the same thing, while avoiding your concerns and those of Noel, who I recollect, wanted to avoid o.a.mail.
sounds good to me. this thread has inspired me to write all my listserv notes in lowercase. :)
-- serge knystautas president lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
