> > This is a very good point! > It is very easy to make a CDI wrapper around an SDI POJO, but the > other way > around is rather difficult. > > This is probably the strongest argument for SDI, I gave seen. > > --Søren
So, so far we've settled on SDI POJOs (possibly with CDI wrappers :) And presumably as we're taking container-independant route, we dont want to rely on any services / lifecycle from the container. So would it be sensible to define our own component lifecycle? Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
