Mike Heath wrote:
Mina is an excellent framework.  The Mina based SMTP handler is much
easier to read and understand than the one in James (at least, IMO).
This all thanks to how well the Mina framework works.

I would be happy to work with any James committers on merging my SMTP
code into the new James HEAD (assuming the vote passes to create a new
HEAD.)  I would also like to work on porting POP, IMAP and NNTP to Mina.

Mike,

I'm really interested in seeing how this looks... I agree the SMTP code in James is less than simple, and from the Mina examples, it does look good.

I'm on the road a bit this week, but when I'm back, I'll checkout what you've got. Hopefully we can figure out some way to get this into James, though that's a pretty non-trivial change. :)

--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to