Danny wrote:
> Mike Heath wrote:
> > The James EHLO response doesn't include the keyword PIPELINING per RFC
> > 1854 even though my understanding of the code would indicate that James
> > does indeed support pipelining.
> I think James does indeed support pipelining
But have we tested and verified that capability, specifically?
> Submit a patch or raise this enhancement in Jira.
Test for RFC compliance first, but yes.
And *PLEASE* submit the patch against the new merged code!
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
