> Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > > > IMHO we need to consider real cases to be able to do > something performant. > > How would SEARCH and FETCH affect performance? > > I think we can get away with stubbing a lot of SEARCH > functionality, but not FETCH. The SEARCH command can return > 'NO' if the operation is too complex. > > Regards, > Kervin
Can you provide a list of most commonly used IMAP commands (by common clients such as Outlook) and their parameters? IMHO we should take into consideration most common commands in order to achieve a performant implementation: we cannot simply index EVERY message property or split the message in hundreds of parts, but we could treat most accessed fields with caching and separate storage. "NO" is the answer for NO results or is defined by the RFC that should be used when a search is too complex? Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
