Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I agree with Stefano. Setup of virtual users and virtual domains
should be modular and as generic as possible.
As such it should be as easy working with any db, directory or xml
definition.
Actually, my view is that the API for dynamic changes should be using JMX,
and that some of these things should be defered until we embed ApacheDS
within the core JAMES. That way, we can count on having both LDAP
(ApacheDS) and JDBC (Derby) available for all deployments.
Yeah! I think the changes I made and I'm planning to do will help the
integration with ApacheDS, too.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
