Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
I don't use a container like phoenix.
Is this possible? Is it possible at all to get rid of the container?
Not without making some code changes.
all what the container would do.
Yeah, that was logical. But I mean the JAMES code. Are there any changes
that must be done in the JAMES code to achieve that? How much effort
would it be?
Also, were you able to totally get rid of the container jars+code?
Thanks in advance,
Keep in mind that get rid of the container (Phoenix) is a different
thing than get rid of the Avalon framework.
Btw I think that the avalon framework itself is a good thing to james
and we could adapt james to run under j2ee or spring without getting rid
of avalon interfaces.
I think most threads here to remove the framework code is "fear of the
unknown". I also was against avalon before I studied it and used it
working on James. If we want to remove the avalon interfaces we should
copy the interfaces to our codebase... what do we get but not being
avalon compatible?
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
