Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that what the work will entail is POJO-ifying James. XBean is
just a way of stitching the POJOs in an IOC type of way. I think that
one could add some OSGi adapters on top, if one wanted to. The nice
thing about this way of organization is that one does not have to use
OSGi if one doesn't want to.
What type of IOC is used by XBeans ?
Is it based on the Service Locator pattern like Avalon or Dependency
Injection? In the latter case, what DI type? Constructor, Setter or
Interface injection?
How is the assembly declared? XML / Naming conventions / Annotations /
Other?
I can't find much docs/informations about it.
Another step would be to replace cornerstone components in favor of
"jakarta-commons" components.
Interesting, can you explain what these cornerstone componets are?
Here you can find an overview on Phoenix/Avalon/Cornerstone/Excalibur:
http://loom.codehaus.org/History
We currently depends on:
avalon-framework (api + impl)
avalon-logkit
cornerstone-connection (api + impl)
cornerstone-datasources (api + impl)
cornerstone-scheduler (api + impl)
cornerstone-sockets (api + impl)
cornerstone-store (api + impl)
cornerstone-threads (api + impl)
excalibur-datasource
excalibur-pool (api + impl)
excalibur-thread (api + impl)
I don't think there is a way to give you access to a branch or a
particular folder of the james subversion repository.
Maybe you should start working in your local sandbox and eventually
add a jira issue where submit your work for review.
No worries. Maybe I should do the work in a Geronimo sandbox then?
I would like to have more informations on XBeans and your plan and know
the opinion of the James PMC about maven2 and xbeans before to tell my
preference on the sandbox location.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
