Steve Brewin wrote:
Does anyone have any OSGi implementation preferences?
IMHO OSGi specifications themselves are too low-level for James needs.
We probably need an abstraction layer (avalon-osgi bridge or
avalon-somelayer bridge) to simplify this move. (as a note Spring is
supporting springbeans-OSGi bridge:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-1802 . I
don't know how this is related to XBean-OSGi)
Most OSGi implementations provides their own services (bundles) to
simplify dependency management for services.
I read something about avalon-osgi bridge in the cocoon-dev mailing
list: they seem to have a test osgified-cocoon in the whiteboard.
Furthermore to replace phoenix we need a Configuration service, possibly
having a management GUI.
If we don't want to create OSGi bundles for each cornerstone/excalibur
service we probably need to find replacements for this service.
Stefano
PS: as a footnote, IMHO an OSGi bundle is less "POJO" than an Avalon block.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
