Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> IMHO OSGi specifications themselves are too low-level for James needs.
> We probably need an abstraction layer (avalon-osgi bridge or
> avalon-somelayer bridge) to simplify this move.
Well ... :-) XBeans will apparently provide a bridge to OSGi, and IIRC, there
is support for Avalon interfaces in XBeans. Alan? Did Dain ever get that work
stable?
> I read something about avalon-osgi bridge in the cocoon-dev mailing
> list: they seem to have a test osgified-cocoon in the whiteboard.
Worth looking into.
> PS: as a footnote, IMHO an OSGi bundle is less "POJO" than an Avalon block.
As I said, I think that it is worth doing the business logic POJOs for our
classes, and then providing the container adapter.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
