Norman Maurer wrote:
I will add this improvment to james as fast as i can.. But i think we
should add this config value do james core and not the smtphandler chain
cause otherwise it whould be in the mail handler (thats a bit
confusing).. What you think ?
I applied the patch as it was (configuration option in the main handler).
I think it would be better to move the option to the MailCmdHandler, but
I would like to know what other developers/users think about this.
We have more similar commands that could be moved to specific handlers.
lengthReset (DATA)
verifyIdentity (RCPT)
ehloHeloEnforcement (MAIL)
While the following require iteraction between handlers.
authorizedAddresses + authRequired (EHLO, MAIL, RCPT)
MaxMessageSize (EHLO, MAIL, DATA, OnMessage)
Another thing we should consider is the postmaster recipient handling:
RFC says we should always accept mails destinated to postmaster. How
should we handle EHLO/HELO enforcements, MAIL FROM domain validation,
EHLO/HELO domain validation and that RFC rule?
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
